Background

The Gamergate 2.0 Timeline: ft. Smash JT and Alyssa Mercante

Alyssa Mercante and Smash JT Lawsuit Gamergate 2 Timeline

A Case Study in Crybulling

Ah, the gaming industry – where the journalists act like rockstars, the YouTubers play watchdog, and everyone thinks they’re the main character. 

Enter Jeff Tarzia, aka Smash JT, a former game industry insider turned YouTube commentator, and Alyssa Mercante, the (now former) senior editor at Kotaku, a site once known for actual game journalism way back in the day, before it pivoted to clickbait and culture war commentary.

What kicked off as a few spicy tweets and YouTube videos quickly devolved into a digital food fight: Mercante accused Smash of harassment, Smash fired back with receipts, and the internet, as always, grabbed popcorn. 

But let’s be clear – this wasn’t some unprovoked attack by a rando on the internet. It was a public figure throwing punches from her soapbox and then crying victim when someone dared to respond with a video…or a hundred.

Smash JT Alyssa Mercante Videos

Image Source: Smash JT Videos on Alyssa Mercante | Google

This isn’t just internet beef – it’s a perfect snapshot of the growing divide between independent creators and a legacy gaming press that seems more interested in moral grandstanding than reporting. 

And in this particular slapfight, one side brought facts. The other brought feelings.

Gamergate 2.0: Sweet Baby Inc. Gets Caught in the Crossfire

January 2024

Remember when gaming was about fun and not about who could out-woke whom? 

Yeah, neither do we. Welcome to Gamergate 2.0. 

This time, the drama centers around Sweet Baby Inc. (SBI), a Montreal-based narrative consulting firm that claims to “promote diversity and inclusion” in video games. But according to critics, they’re less about storytelling and more about shoehorning DEI checkboxes into every possible pixel.

The controversy ignited when Brazilian gamer KabrutusRambo created a Steam curator group called “Sweet Baby Inc. Detected,” aiming to flag games influenced by SBI’s consulting. The group quickly gained traction among gamers skeptical of forced diversity in their favorite titles.

DEI Detected SBI Detected Steam Curator Page

Image Source: Sweet Baby Inc Detected | Steam

Meet Chris Kindred, a (now former) SBI employee who decided that the best way to handle criticism was to call for mass reporting of the curator group and its creator, trying to get his group and personal Steam account shut down.

Because nothing says “we value diverse voices” like trying to silence dissenting ones. 

Kindred’s actions led to a significant backlash, with many accusing SBI of attempting to suppress legitimate criticism under the guise of combating harassment.

And report the creator since he loves his account so much.

The situation escalated further when Kindred labeled members of the curator group as “Nazis,” a move that did little to quell the flames and instead poured gasoline on the fire. 

Chris Kindred X Calling DEI Detected Nazi

Image Source: Chris Kindred | X

This whole episode serves as a gentle reminder in how not to handle a situation. 

Instead of engaging in open dialogue, the SBI employee approach seemed to be: “Agree with us, or we’ll cancel you.” 

A bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see how it plays out.

Sweet Baby Inc. Does What You Think They Do and More

March 2024

Back in the thick of Gamergate 2.0, former Kotaku senior editor Alyssa Mercante rolled out what many saw as a puff piece titled “Sweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Do What Some Gamers Think It Does”In it, she essentially tells the gaming public: “Calm down, folks. Sweet Baby Inc. isn’t the puppet master you think it is.” 

It was a classic “trust me, bro” move – reassuring readers that SBI wasn’t sneaking DEI agendas into games under the radar, but instead just a harmless “narrative consultation firm.” 

The article reads like someone trying to put out a dumpster fire by spraying it with lighter fluid and beating it with used diapers.

Sweet Baby Doesn't Do What You Think It Does

Image Source: Sweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Do What Some Gamers Think It Does | Kotaku

Gamers, however, weren’t buying it. The piece landed Mercante right in the firing line of public ridicule – and in classic Alyssa style, she seemed to lean into the controversy instead of backing away.

More recently (February 2025 to be specific), the independent husband and wife YouTube investigators, Gothic Therapy, were peeling back layers others weren’t willing to touch. They uncovered a troubling web connecting Sweet Baby Inc. to Wings Interactive, a funding group with deep ties to Landfall Games, the studio behind titles like Totally Accurate Battle Simulator.

This isn’t your typical indie funding story. Wings Interactive, officially known as Vingar Interaktiva AB, shares not only addresses but board members with Landfall Games. 

Petter Henriksson, Landfall’s co-founder, moonlights as Wings Interactive’s Vice CEO, a fact curiously missing from his public profiles.

Gothic Therapy reported that Kim Belair, CEO of Sweet Baby Inc., sat on Wings Interactive’s selection board, giving SBI direct influence over where funding and narrative shaping might flow. 

To top it off, Riot Games allegedly funneled a cool $1 million into Wings in 2021, painting a picture of a quietly coordinated industry machine behind the scenes.

When these revelations surfaced, Wings Interactive didn’t respond with clarity – instead, social media profiles disappeared, websites went dark, and the digital trail grew cold. 

The very group claiming to support indie devs was suddenly operating like a ghost in the machine.

So while Alyssa Mercante’s article tried to dismiss and downplay the fears around Sweet Baby Inc., the real story is a tangled web of connections that suggest a bigger game being played – one where DEI and “woke” agendas might just be getting more play than some gamers would like to admit.

Escalation – Attacks and Public Statements

April 2024

Ah, things started heating up faster than a GPU hitting 90°C under full load. Alyssa Mercante, once Kotaku’s senior editor and now something of a lightning rod for controversy, really turned heads with one of her most infamous takes: the tweet claiming, “You can’t be racist to white people.” 

Yeah, she unironically said that.

Not exactly the best PR move when you’re already in the crosshairs of a community that’s skeptical of woke narratives seeping into their beloved hobby. 

This tweet wasn’t just tone-deaf; many saw it as a textbook example of how the woke crowd can sometimes push narratives that feel more divisive than unifying – but hey, that’s just my opinion.

But then things got personal. 

In May 2024, Mercante slid into Smash JT’s wife’s Facebook DMs. For someone who regularly cries harassment, this move looked…well, kinda ironic. 

Accusations flew that she was stirring drama in Smash JT’s personal life – a move that pushed the dispute beyond online squabbles and into “why the hell would you do that?” territory. And yeah, this didn’t do much to soften public perception.

The saga didn’t stop there. 

Later that same month, Smash JT’s website (SmashJT.com) faced a temporary shutdown over the weekend – apparently the result of a mass reporting campaign. 

The instigator? 

None other than Nick Calandra, Editor-in-Chief of Second Wind, who rallied people to report Smash JT’s Wix-hosted site, forcing it offline. 

Of course, it didn’t stay down for long; Smash JT managed to get it restored once the Wix offices opened on Monday. But it was a stark reminder that this wasn’t just online chatter – people were actively trying to take each other’s platforms offline.

The whole situation was quickly spiraling into a mess of petty vendettas, internet drama, and public smackdowns, setting the stage for what would become a full-blown legal war.

The Giant Bomb Challenge That Bombed Hard

June 2024

Just when you thought this saga couldn’t get any weirder, Alyssa Mercante took things to the next level, because why settle for online spats when you can throw down in real life, right?

During a Giant Bomb podcast appearance, Mercante made headlines with a bold, eyebrow-raising challenge to her critics: “Come fight me, physically.” 

Yep, you read that right. 

While most people hide behind keyboards and Twitter fingers, Alyssa was apparently ready to settle scores with some good old-fashioned fist-to-face combat. Or at least, that’s what it sounded like.

But plot twist: when some brave souls actually took her up on the offer – because apparently keyboard warriors can sometimes get off their chairs – Mercante did a classic about-face and suddenly found reasons to backpedal

The “fight me” bravado McFizzled faster than a soda left open overnight.

Predictably, this didn’t earn her any points with the community. Instead, it painted her as someone all talk and no action – kind of like that one guy who threatens to throw down at a party but ends up hiding behind the snack table. 

The whole episode just added fuel to the fire, turning a public figure who thrives on controversy into an even bigger meme.

The Legal Battle Begins

December 2024

Things took a serious turn when Alyssa Mercante decided to throw down the legal gauntlet.

She filed a lawsuit against Jeff Tarzia – aka Smash JT – charging him with defamation, the somewhat eyebrow-raising claim of stochastic terrorism, and a funderful list of other things.

Yeah, that’s a mouthful, but basically means she accused him of indirectly inciting harm against her through his videos and commentary.

Smash JT wasn’t about to roll over, though. 

He quickly hired Ron Coleman, a heavyweight attorney known for defending creators in online controversies, and fired back with a motion to dismiss the case. His stance? That his videos were protected free speech, exposing the truth of a public figure as he saw it rather than trying to incite anything illegal.

The public response was…let’s say loud. Smash JT’s fans and supporters rallied around him, pouring funds into his legal defense faster than it took Concord to fail.

The outpouring showed just how much his message resonated with people who are fed up with the same tired narratives dominating mainstream gaming media.

In short: this wasn’t just a courtroom battle; it became a cultural flashpoint over free speech, accountability, and what happens when internet drama crosses into legal territory.

Digital Footprints and Deleted Tweets

December 2024

Shortly after the lawsuit began, sharp eyes noticed something curious: Alyssa Mercante was allegedly going on a tweet-deleting spree. Numerous tweets, some of which supposedly contained controversial or inflammatory statements, vanished into the digital ether faster than you can screenshot them.

This raised eyebrows for obvious reasons.

In any legal battle, your social media history isn’t just casual scrolling material – it’s potential evidence. And deleting tweets during ongoing litigation? That’s like trying to clean up the crime scene while the cops are still there.

Legal experts chimed in, warning that such digital vanishings could be seen as spoliation of evidence, fancy lawyer talk for “destroying or hiding evidence.” That can seriously backfire in court, sometimes even resulting in penalties or unfavorable judgments.

So, while Mercante was busy supposedly scrubbing her timeline, observers wondered if this was just damage control or something more. In the internet age, your tweets don’t disappear, they just get buried, and people like Smash JT and his legal team?

They’ve got receipts and the internet is forever.

The Discord Revelation

March 2025

Just when you thought this saga had reached peak chaos, enter the paywalled Discord den of doom, a secret clubhouse where Alyssa Mercante and a handful of other suspicious characters plotted against content creators like Smash JT and Grummz aka Mark Kern.

How did this come to light? 

Thanks to the absolute Chad, Gigabear, who reportedly paid the entrance fee to this digital lion’s den and exposed the twisted inner workings of the group.

This wasn’t your average gamer chat. Members included “Bee” (aka WashYourCrack on X), who had the audacity to post Grummz’s private login credentials in plain text; Alyssa Mercante herself; Nick Calandra of Second Wind; and other notable social leeches like McDizzle, Airbagged (a Twitter ban magnet), and thiefpal.

Within this pay-to-play harassment hub, they didn’t just toss insults – they actually plotted (that thing they always accuse right-leaning YouTubers of?).

Discussions included digging through databreaches to grab login info for Grummz, Airbagged coordinating mass community notes campaigns to flag and bury critics, and Alyssa Mercante actively soliciting help to dig up dirt on Smash JT’s past employment history.

This revelation painted Mercante and her crew as not just salty critics but part of a calculated, subscription-fueled harassment operation. 

It’s one thing to debate opinions; it’s another entirely to be a part of a terminally online squad of leftist ideologues focused on taking people down.

Whether you call it justifiable defense or full-blown conspiracy, this Discord drama shines a glaring spotlight on just how ugly and organized modern gaming media feuds have become.

But can you please explain to us again how extreme everyone is that doesn’t agree with you politically, Alyssa?

The Fallout

Alyssa Mercante quietly exited the crumbling remains of a once-respected gaming site and tried to spin this lawsuit into a personal rebrand. 

Now unemployed from gaming media, Mercante has seemingly pivoted from “senior editor” to professional victim – tweeting, posting, and begging for attention (and money) like it’s the only job left in town.

Rather than fade into irrelevance with the rest of Kotaku’s collapsing credibility, she’s now attempting to stay in the spotlight by using this lawsuit as a last-ditch effort to remain culturally relevant. Whether it’s through vague threats, Patreon paywalls, or fishing for support on social media, Mercante’s moves scream desperation – not principle.

Meanwhile, the broader industry isn’t “grappling” with diversity and inclusion – it’s choking on it.

For years, we’ve watched major publishers force identity politics into games under the guise of “representation,” then act surprised when fans walk away. It’s not that players are inherently against stories that feature female leads or anyone that’s “not white” – they’re against bad storytelling and patronizing lectures being disguised as games.

Just look at the scoreboard: Monster Hunter Wilds, Oblivion Remastered, and R.E.P.O. are generating massive hype because they’re focused on what matters – gameplay, immersion, and fun.

On the flip side, games like Assassin’s Creed Shadows and Avowed are being met with massive pushback, boycotts, and collapsing pre-orders for one reason: they forgot who their audience is.

They’re more concerned with making political statements than making games people actually want to play.

Mercante’s saga is just a symptom of a larger rot in games media – a space that used to report on the industry and now tries to morally police it. 

Her fall from Kotaku, and her attempt to make a career out of canceling others while claiming victimhood, is a cautionary tale. It’s a peek behind the curtain of an industry so addicted to virtue signaling and Twitter approval that it forgot how to be fun.

So Why The Hell Am I Writing This Whole Thing?

What started as another routine puff piece from the remnants of legacy games media spiraled into a full-blown saga of petty grudges, legal threats, secret Discord plots, and one of the most bizarre internet meltdowns we’ve seen in years. 

At the center of it all? 

A journalist desperate to stay relevant, a YouTuber refusing to back down, and an industry so drunk on its own moral posturing that it forgot how to do its actual job.

The final push to write this came after watching Alyssa Mercante’s recent video, Hating Me Gets Them Views, Here’s My Story – a tear-soaked PR spin attempting to show herself as the victim while conveniently omitting the entire Discord campaign, the side of SBI that she didn’t write about, and the aggressive behavior that started and escalated this mess in the first place. 

It’s a classic case of playing defense with selective memory – and if you only heard her side, you’d never guess how deep the rabbit hole goes. 

Accountability matters, but it has to go both ways. 

You can’t scream “harassment” while organizing smear campaigns in private servers. You can’t claim to be a champion of truth while deleting tweets and hiding behind paywalls. And you sure as hell can’t play the victim while threatening to fight people on a podcast and then running away.

That being said, please do NOT harass anyone mentioned in this article. Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t the whole story (for either side) – this is more of of “most memorable moments” of this journey for anyone that needed a little perspective after Alyssa’s video recent release.

This whole debacle exposed more than just one journalist’s questionable behavior – it peeled back the mask on a decaying media landscape where clout chasing has replaced ethics, where outrage is currency, and where criticism is only valid if it’s aimed in the “correct” direction.

The gaming community isn’t perfect – far from it – but it’s gotten real tired of being talked down to by people who don’t play games, don’t understand their audiences, and treat their platforms like personal soapboxes. 

The response to this controversy wasn’t driven by hate — it was driven by exhaustion.

Exhaustion with the hypocrisy, the attempts at censorship, and endlessly trying to shame gamers into silence whenever they question the narrative.

If this situation teaches us anything, it’s that sunlight is still the best disinfectant. And when the mainstream won’t tell the truth, someone else will – whether the gaming media likes it or not.

This was a commentary article based on publicly available information and personal opinion. Readers are encouraged to form their own conclusions based on the sources cited.

All images, logos, and video clips used in this article are the property of their respective owners. This content is used for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting under the guidelines of Fair Use (17 U.S.C. § 107). No copyright infringement is intended. If you are the copyright holder and believe your content has been used improperly, please contact us directly.

Want More?

Check These Out Next!

About Report AFK

A place for gamers, by gamers, untarnished by corporate gaming media and their nonstop attempts to elevate bad games while denouncing any developers brave enough to stand up to them. 

Login to enjoy everything in ReportAFK.com!

Login to continue.

Go Premium!

Enjoy the full advantage of the premium access.

Login

Stop following

Unfollow Cancel

Cancel subscription

Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.

Go back Confirm cancellation